Law and Justice during Mughal Period
Law and Justice during Mughal Period |
As the Muslim state was theocratic, the
sultans of Delhi established Islamic institutions and laws in India. They did
not treat Hindus as first-rate citizen and forced them to pay Jaziya like
Zammies or protected people. The Quran (the religious scripture), the Hadis
(the traditions) and Ijma (consensus of opinion) were the basis of their law
and justice. It proved useful to Muslims only. Hindus were treated improperly. Although
Hindus lived in a Muslim state yet they followed their own personal law but in
case of any dispute between the Hindus and the Muslims, the latter were granted
favour. Hence Justice during the Delhi Sultanate was not dispensed equally to
all people. But when the Mughals ascended the throne, they tried to dispense
justice to all equally. Akbar was the first Mughal emperor who tried to
establish a secular state in India. He established political supremacy over the
Ulemas.
The emperor was the highest authority
in law and justice. Nobody could challenge his authority but he alone could not
administer justice smoothly, so some officers were appointed to look after this
work.t he power and position of chief Qazi was next to the emperor and he used
to dispense justice in the capital. Qazis worked in various provinces, cities
and also in parganas. Cases pertaining to properly and religion were decided by
the provincial Qazis, Muftis; the interpreters of Islamic law, often helped
them in their work of justice. Diwan, Amalguzar, Amil etc. dealt with revenue
disputes but Subedars, Faujdars and Kotwals looked after criminal cases and
settled them. Some Hindu Pandits and Purohits were also employed by Akbar so
that the cases of Hindus be settled according to their own laws. The village
Panchayats was authorized to settle disputes pertaining to their own village. But
in matter of criminal cases Islamic law was imposed on all subjects without
distinction of caste and creed. Dr. Ishwari Prasad mentions, “There were no
professional lawyers, trained in law and conversant with social usage and
regulations of the state and since the parties had to plead their case I person,
we may presume that justice was not always done to the simple villager who was
helpless against a rapacious official or an influential opponent.”
All the Mughal emperors except Akbar
settled their disputes according to Islamic law. Akbar was the first Mughal who
also paid attention towards Hindu law and tradition before arriving at a final
decision, but after his death the system of secular justice came to an end and
the later Mughals began to work according to their own choice.
Kinds of Crime :- According to the
Quran the crimes were divided into three categories : (i) Crimes against God,
(ii) State crimes, (iii) Personal Crimes.
The crimes against God were
unpardonable before law and the culprit was sure to be punished for such crimes
but in case of the remaining two crimes mercy could be shown.
According to the Quran four types of
punishment were prevalent : (i) Hadd, (ii) Nazir, (iii) Kisas, and (iv)
Tahshir. Hadd was awarded for crimes against god which were unpardonable. The punishment
which was given to the criminal for mending his ways was called Nazir. For such
crimes sometimes the criminal was required to pay fine. He was dragged on the
threshold of the court of justice, condemned by the people and also imprisoned,
exiled, and thrashed by whip. Murder and severe injury came into the category
of Kisas. Sometime in case of compromise the culprits saved their lives by
paying heavy fines. But no compromise was arrived at in some cases. The Qazi
seeing the gravity of the case was authorized to award capital punishment to
the culprit. The theory of ‘tooth for tooth’ and ‘eye for eye’ was also in
vague during the Mughal period.
The Mughal penal code was quite severe.
Mutilation of limbs and physical torture was awarded by the qazis with the
consent of the emperor only. As there was no specific punishment for treason,
misappropriation of imperial wealth and non-payment of revenue, so the emperor
was at liberty to use his own discretion in such crimes. Generally the
criminals were imprisoned for trivial offences.
Almost all the emperors of Mughal
period paid attention to the maintenance of law and imparted equal justice to
all. Emperor Jahangir was popularly known for his golden chain. Shahjahan and
Aurangzeb also heard the appeals of the exploited on Wednesdays. Akbar paid
special attention to the appointment of impartial judges. Akbar even permitted
his people to file a suit against him. Aurangzeb introduced a lot of reforms in
the field of law and justice and got a judicial book Fatwa-i-Jahandari prepared
so that the judges could perform their duty properly well.
However the Mughal administration of
Justice was not free from shortcomings. Its following demerits throw light upon
its improper implementation.
1. The non-Muslims had to face several
problems in the sphere of Justice as the religious laws and civil laws were not
separate.
2. The Qazis of the contemporary
period were not persons of character. They did not accept the ideals of
justice. Almost all of them were greedy and accepted gifts and bribes
unhesitatingly. Some of them were even not well-versed in laws and traditions,
so they used to do whatever they liked. Some of them worked only two or three
days in a week and had the courts at their residences. All this adversely
affected justice.
3. There was acute shortage of
judicial books in the country and the judicial authorities could not be well
acquainted with the rules.
4. Mutual relations among the
different courts were not smooth and their working and scope was not well
arranged.
5. There was no proper system of
evidence. It often led to arbitrary decisions.
6.Punishments were very stern.
7. The Ulemas had majority in the
department of justice and their narrow outlook often affected the judgments.
8. There was no proper arrangement for
detecting crimes.
9. Police and spies also had various
defects. They often delivered wrong information to imperial court and sometimes
became party with antisocial elements.
10. The employees of judicial
department were paid scanty salaries, hence they resorted to bribe and
corruption.
11. The condition of prison s was unsatisfactory
and the culprits had to suffer a lot during imprisonment.
Akbar and Aurangzeb tried their best
to overcome these difficulties but they could not succeed in their mission. However,
it has been regarded as fairly successful, the credit of which goes to Akbar,
the most renowned ruler of the Mughal period. It provided peace, prosperity and
security to the subjects and the later rulers imitated it to a great extent.
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.