Was
Muhammad-bin-Tughluq a Mixture of Opposites?
The
charge against Muhammad-bin-Tughluq was that he was a mixture of opposites.
Barani also refers to some conflicting habits of the Sultan. Dr. V.A. Smith
writes, “Notwithstanding that Muhammad-bin-Tughluq was guilty of acts, which
the pen shrinks from recording, he was not wholly evil. He was a mixture of opposites as Jahangir was
in his later age.”
Dr.
Ishwari Prasad does not agree to this view of Dr. V. A. Smith. He writes, “Only
when viewed superficially, Muhammad appears to be an ‘amazing compound of
contradictions’ but he was not really so.” K.A. Nizami also does not accept
him as a mixture of opposites. He stresses that the opinion that he was a mass
of inconsistencies, was floated by Barani who himself never stuck to one point
and always made vague remarks. In the words of Nizami, “When Barani is in
the present, he has love for Muhammad-bin-Tughluq : when he is in the past, he
has nothing but hatred for him.”
Dr. Mehdi
Husain also writes that he was not a mixture of opposites. He stresses that his
contradictory qualities appeared at different stages of his career and there
were specific reasons for it. Hence it would be a wrong estimation to call him
a mixture of opposites.
But at some
occasions we see that Muhammad-bin-Tughluq acted in a contradictory manner. He
disliked low and mean persons and yet he appointed them on high posts. He was
quite humble and at the same time extremely arrogant. He was generous, yet
cruel. Therefore, he is compared with James I of England and called the ‘wisest
fool’; hence some of the scholars like Dr. A.L. Srivastava agree that
Muhammad-bin-Tughluq was a mixture of contradictions. Dr. R.C. Majumdar has
also written, “He was not a monster or a lunatic, as has been suggested by
some, but there is no doubt, he was a mixture of contradictions, or his many
good qualities of head and heart seem to be quite incompatible with certain
traits of vices in his character, such as, revolting cruelty, frivolous caprice
and an excessive belief in his own view of things.” Thus if
Muhammad-bin-Tughluq was not a mad Sultan, he was a person having contradictory
qualities.
In spite of these shortcomings he has been
praised by Sir Wolseley Haig, “He was one of the most extraordinary monarchs
who ever sat upon a throne.” Dr. Ishwari Prasad, Gardener Brown etc, have
also praised him for his scholarly caliber and personal characteristics.
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.