Revenue Reforms of Muhammad-bin-Tughluq
First of all, the
Sultan intended to make some reforms in revenue system and made several
declarations and issued ordinances. He also ordered the royal officials to
prepare the accounts of the provinces and to send them immediately to the
centre. Most of the governors obeyed the orders of the Sultan and dispatched
their accounts forthwith. In fact, the Sultan wanted to introduce a uniform
policy of revenue in the entire kingdom.
Increase of Tax on Doab ( A.D. 1326-27)
Among the schemes of Muhammad-bin-Tughluq the increase of tax in
the Doab is considered as one of the significant ones. The following factors
contributed to its implementation. :
Cause of Increase in Tax
(1) In the distribution of rewards, titles and charity, the sultan
had given away a lot of money at the time of his coronation which affected the
royal treasury otherwise, but the Sultan needed a lot of wealth for
administering the affairs of the State, for the upkeep of the army and for
executing his ambitious plans. Dr. Ishawari Prasad affirms, “The chief motive
seems to have been to obtain revenue in order to be able to increase his
military resources and to organize the administration on an efficient basis.”
(2) The region of Doab was quite fertile and the people led a
prosperous life. The Sultan had an idea that people of the Doab would be in a
position to pay the increase tax easily. Alauddin Khalji had already realized
50 per cent Khiraj from the people of this area.
(3) Mostly, the Hindus lived in this area of the Doab, who often
revolted and conspired against the authority of Delhi Sultanate because of
their riches, so he increased the tax in order to curb the rebellious tendency
of the Hindus and to reduce them to poverty.
(4) IN those days it was presumed that since the Sultan had
established his influence over the people of the Doab region, he not only
succeeded in getting wealth but also established his control over the entire
Northern India.
Controversy regarding the Rate of Tax
Being motivated by the reasons referred to above,
Muhammad-bin-Tughluq took a decision to increase taxes in the Doab region. But
to what level were the taxes raised, is not clear from various sources, and
scholars hold different opinions about the rate of increase. Gardner Brown
mentions that the rise of tax was quite normal. Barani remarks, “Taxes were increased
by ten to twenty times.” Ferista, a contemporary historian, mentions that
the increase was three-fold or four-fold. Haziuddin writes, “After the victory of
Islam the land which earned one Tanks now began to pay ten to twenty Tankas.”
Most of the scholars believe that the Sultan began to realize Khiraj at the
rate of 50 per cent of the total product. The Sultan made some special
arrangement before introducing this scheme. He appointed a revenue officer in
each village to keep a close watch over the activities of Khuts, Muqaddams and
Chaudharis. Besides increase in taxes, Barani remarks that house tax and
pasture tax were also imposed on the people of the Doab. But it is a fact that
taxes were increased during his reign. Lanepoole writes, “The revenues were
collected so rigorously that the peasants were reduced to beggary. The rich
became rebels and the land fell out of cultivation.”
The Result of
Increase
(1) The increase
in taxes harmed the peasantry very much and they opposed it vehemently.
(2) The corrupt
officers realized the taxes beyond the limit of increase. It generated
rebellious feelings among the people.
(3) The revenue
officers ignored the circumstances of the Doab and tried to realize the
increased tax by ‘blood and iron’ policy which enraged the people.
(4) Under normal
circumstances the increase would not have been opposed but the area of the Doab
was hit by famine, hence the enhanced taxes were opposed. The royal officials
failed to send correct information to the Sultan; rather they oppressed the
famine-striken people and realized the taxes.
Measure of Relief
The Sultan was a
great well-wisher of his people. He was
ignorant of the condition of the people of the Doab but as soon as he was
acquainted with the famine and drought, he withdrew the ordinance and adopted
relief measures for the good of peasantry.
Critical Estimate
of the Scheme
Barani is the
first and the foremost historian who has vehemently criticized this scheme but
there is much exaggeration in his condemnation due to two chief reasons. First,
he was himself an inhabitant of Doab region and secondly, he belonged to the Ulema
class, who opposed the Sultan due to his liberal religious policy but as an
impartial reader we must admit that there must be some truth in his
condemnation. But at the same time, the relief measures of the Sultan proved
that he did not want to oppress the people. He tried to help the people of Doab
as soon as he came to know of their actual condition. His scheme was fine and
there was not slackness init but the natural
famine and drought proved to be the greatest hindrance which was none of the
faults of the Sultan but really, it is a matter of surprise that the sultan
live so near to Doab and he did not know about the condition of his subjects. It
shows his negligence. Hence, if not wholly, he was partly responsible for the
suffering of the people of the Doab and destruction of agriculture.
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.