Nasiruddin Mahmud
Nasiruddin Mahmud |
Sultan of Delhi
Reign – A.D.
1246-1266
Father - Prince
Nasiruddin
Nasiruddin Mahmud
was the grandson of Iltutmish. He succeeded the throne after Alauddin Masud Shah on 10th June, A.D. 1246. He was the son of prince Nasiruddin
who breathed his last in Bengal in April, A.D. 1229. Nasiruddin was a
posthumous child. He had seen the fate of the earlier successors of his
grandfather. After his enthronement he handed over all the powers of the Sultanate
to the Turkish nobles and remained ruler of Delhi in name only.
Prior to his
installation as Sultan he was Governor of Bahraich. When the conspiracy was
hatched against Masud Shah, he brought to Delhi in the disguise of a woman and
made to occupy the throne by the conspirators. Balbal was also a staunch supporter
of Nasiruddin and was later on appointed Naib, probably as reward of his
treachery. He remained Naib-i-Mamlakat throughout the reign of Nasiruddin
except in the year A.D. 1253, when Raihan was appointed on this post. Balban
wanted to strengthen his power, so he gave his daughter in marriage to Nasiruddin,
the Sultan of Delhi. On this occasion the post of Naib-i-Mamlakat and the title
of Ulugh Khan were bestowed on him. In fact, Balban was the ruler of Delhi and
he enjoyed all the powers whereas Nasiruddin was a puppet king.
As Nasiruddin was
a feeble Sultan, several stories are available about his life. Some of the
historians mention that he was a purely religious-minded person. He did not
have interest in worldly affairs. He used to make a copy of the Quran and perform
other religious activities. His wife prepared meals for him. One day when her
finger was burnt while coking, she requested her husband to employ a
maid-servant for her but he refused to do so because he considered himself the
servant of the state and not the master. But all these stories are unbelievable.
Firstly, his wife was the daughter of Balban and it was not expected of her to
work in the kitchen like an ordinary woman. Secondly, if he was a religious
person, he should not have taken part in the dethronement of Alauddin Masud
Shah in the disguise of a woman.
The truth is that
he was very tender in age at the time of his accession and he had seen the
slaughter of his predecessors, hence being terrorized he made use of his
commonsense and without opposing the Turkish nobles, he surrendered before
them. Islami writes about the status of Nasiruddin, “he expressed no opinion
without their permission, he did not move his hands or feet except on their
order. He would neither drink water nor go to sleep except with their
knowledge.” K.A. Nizami, writes, “His surrender was absolute.”
In fact, during
the reign of Nasiruddin, Balban controlled all the affairs of state whereas the
king, remained confined in his places and never performed any act as could
offend the nobles.
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.