Muhammad-Bin-Tughluq
Sultan of Delhi during Tughluq Dynasty
Reign – A.D. 1325 to 1351
Father – Ghiasuddin Tughluq
Three days after the assassination of
Ghiasuddin Tughluq, Juna Khan alias Ulugh Khan ascended the throne of Delhi at
Tughluqabad in February-March A.D. 1325 as it would have been dangerous to keep
the throne vacant. He assumed the title of Muhammad-bin-Tughluq.
Muhammad-Bin-Tughluq has been the most
controversial personality in the history of medieval India. He had a very
charming personality and possessed a good physique. His character has given
rise to great confusion and complexities. Historians like Ibn Batuta and Barani
have expressed contrary views regarding the character and personality of
Muhammad-Bin-Tughluq. On the basis of their description modern scholars of
history also hold contrary views. Dr. R.C. Majumdar remarks, “No ruler in
medieval India has evoked so much discussion concerning his policy and
character as Muhammad-bin-Tughluq.” Elphinstone has also remarked about
him, “It is admitted on all hands that he was the most eloquent and
accomplished prince of his age….. yet him in vain. They were accompanied by a
perversion of judgment which after every allowance for intoxication of absolute
power leads us in doubt whether he was not affected by some degree of
insanity.”
V.A. Smith, Havell and Edward Thomas
also agree with Elphinstone. But only Gardener Brown writes in his praise, “That
he was mad is a view of which contemporaries have given no hint, that he was
visionary, his many-sides practical and vigorous character forbids us to
believe.” Dr. Iswari Prasad also praises him in these words, “Muhammad
Tughluq was unquestionably the ablest among the crowned heads of the middle
ages.”
But close and impartial study of the
character and personality of the Sultan reveals that he was a very scholarly
person who was quite generous in temperament, tolerant in religious views, a
worthy soldier and a dispenser of equal justice. He was an inventor and
farsighted statesman but he was an unsuccessful ruler. However, his character
and personality can be traced properly as a man, as a commander and as a ruler.
As a man
Dr. Ishwari Prasad has highly praised him and pointed out that he
was the most learned and accomplished ruler of his times Barani also writes
that he was an accomplished poet. Besides being learned, the sultan was very
generous in his personal life. Ibn Batuta mentions, “The emperor was so
generous as to bestow a treasury on a beggar and to think lighly of his gifts.
In the matter of granting Bakshish, the rich and the poor, the friend and the
stranger, were all one him.” He had a keen intellect and was always prepared to
help the poor.
Muhammad Tughluq had a unique knowledge of logic, philosophy,
mathematics, astronomy and physical sciences. He had the capacity to
appreciate the excellences of poetry and criticize their works on the basis of
his versatile knowledge.
Muhammad-bin-Tughluq was the true devotee of Islam. Ibn Batuta
writes, “He follows the princi;oes of religion with devoutness and performs the
prayers himself and punishes those who neglect them.” He regularly offered five
prayers in a day and performed Rozas punctually. He never took wine and
followed the religious scripture of Islam verbatim. He was given the robe of
honour by the Abbasid Khalifa of Egypt and he expressed his reverence to a
descendant of the Khalifa of Baghdad. But he was not a fanatic or a bigot. His
behavior towards the Hindus was quite tolerant. During his reign the Hindus
were appointed on posts of pride and honour. Ratan was on e of his trusted
revenue officers. Thus, he was a true devotee of Islam and tolerant towards all
religions.
As a commander
Muhammad-bin-Tughluq was a great conqueror and a successful
general. Owing to his high ambitions he wanted to establish his control over
the entire India. Besides the northern provinces, he conquered the southern
provinces like Malabar, Warangal and Dwarasamudra. He was not satisfied just
with making them his feudatories but he incorporated their kingdoms in the
Delhi Sultanate. Thus he was poles apart from his predecessor Alauddin as
regards the aims of his Deccan to accept his suzerainty and did not annex their
kingdoms. Some scholars opine that Muhammad-bin-Tughluq was not a successful
general as he failed to crush the revolts after A.D. 1335 in various parts of
the empire. Hence many provinces became independent. As a commander he, instead
of strengthening the empire, contributed o its weakening. But this view is not
acceptable. It is just an underestimation of an otherwise worthy soldier.
Really, he was the most capable commander. He achieved brilliant success
against the Mongols and successfully led expeditions against other rulers. His
military power was shattered due to natural calamities, such as, famine, plague
and cholera. However, his failures against the rebels were not due to lack of
military skill in him but because of natural calamities that were beyond his
power to control.
As a Ruler
Muhammad-bin-Tughluq was a great administrative genius. As a ruler
he was devoted to his duties. He was not a man of narrow tendencies. He
allowed everybody to get an appointment in any post in the empire on his merit
without any distinction of caste and creed. His attitude towards the Hindus was
tolerant in the beginning. Ibn Batuta informs us that he appointed several
Hindus on high posts in his empire. He always looked after the interests of the
peasants. He set up a new department, called Diwan-i-Kohi for the progress and
development of agriculture. Through this department he tried to make land
cultivable and to provide all possible help to the peasants at the time of
need. He also introduced some revenue reforms and stressed that up-to-date
account of income and expenditure should be maintained. Elphinstone has written
about his achievements in all spheres, “He was regular in his
devotions, abstained from wine, and conformed in his private life to all the
moral precepts of his religion. In war he was distinguished for his gallantry
and personal activity, so that his contemporaries were justified in esteeming
him as one of the wonders of the age.”
The sultan undertook certain administrative experiments due to
fertility of his mind, like transfer of capital, issue of token currency and
raising of taxation in Doab. These projects were not the Utopian schemes as
described by various authors. They had some logic and every scheme was
motivated by some definite reasons. T here was a feeling of public welfare
behind all his schemes but owing to the ill fate of the Sultan, his schemes
started with all good intentions but failed disastrously due to adverse
circumstances. There were actually no defects in his projects but the natural
calamities made them unsuccessful. The wrong implementation of the schemes was
also a significant reason which contributed to its downfall.
Thus Sultan Muhammad-bin-Tughluq proved unsuccessful as a ruler.
Different historians have condemned him by saying that he was a mixture of
opposites, an unpractical ruler and had a tough of insanity but if we discuss
these charges impartially, we shall find that none of the charges proves to be
true. It was only the jealousy of the orthodox Muslim class which found
expression in their views against the Sultan who was a tolerant king and who
treated everybody equally without the distinction of caste and creed. He was
the first Muslim ruler who took part in the festival of Holi. The Ulema could
not tolerate his generous nature and they condemned him and even called him an
infidel, an irreligious person.
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.