Cause of Rapid
Dynastic Changes during Delhi Sultanate
If we make a
comparative study of the period of the Delhi Sultanate and of the Mughal
Empire, we shall note a specific difference between the two. During the Mughal
reign only one dynasty ruled over India for about 250 yeas whereas during
Sultanate period from A.D. 1206 to 1526 various dynasties ruled over India. The
following were the reasons of the rapid dynastic changes during this period.
1. There was no law
of succession among the Turk and Afghan ruler. Every Muslim was entitled to
reach the throne by dint of his courage and sagacity without any distinction of
caste or creed. Hence every ambitious person tried to get the throne on the
basis of this principle whether he had any connection with the royal family or
not. During this period various powerful provincial governors tried to capture
the throne. Before becoming the rulers of Delhi Sultanate, Iltutmish,
Jalaluddin Khanji, Allauddin Khalji, Ghiasuddin Tughluq and Bahlol Lodi had
been provincial governors and none of them except Alauddin Khalji was connected
with the royal family. All the revolts which took place during this period were
also motivated by the absence of the law of succession as everybody felt that
if he could wield the sword and made a bit of effort, the throne would have
been in his possession.
2. The central
government was quite weakened. It was based on the personal capability of the
Sultan and there was no guarantee that the successor of worthy ruler would be an
efficient one. On the other hand, it was often noted that the successors of
powerful rulers often proved weak and unworthy as they were brought up in the
dirty atmosphere of the royal palaces where comforts and luxuries were in
profusion. As the Turks were foreigners, they had to face active resistance of
the Hindus, hence whenever a weak successor got the throne, disintegration set
in. hence the nobles always preferred a powerful person to be enthroned without
considering whether he was connected to the royal family or not.
3. The Slave system
which gave birth of Sultans like Aibak, Iltutmish and Balban degenerated with
the passage of time. The number of slaves increased very much and it was not
possible to educate them all in administration or army but they used to get
enough of money and leisure because of being royal slaves. They were also
treated properly in comparison to other slaves. As a result, they became
pleasure loving and lazy. Thus, a good system became corrupt and failed to
produce salves like Aibak and Iltutmish in the long run. On the other hand, the
treachery of Malik Kafur and Malik Khusrau Khan brought bad name to the
sultanate. They acted against the interests of their masters. Malik Kafur
conspired against the life of Alauddin Khalji and perhaps got him killed
through poison. He also blinded the sons of Alauddin and had he not been
killed, he would have destroyed the entire family of Alauddin. Malik Khusrau
Khan murdered his master Mubarak shah and captured the throne. Thus, the slave
system contributed to the rapid dynastic changes during Delhi Sultanate.
4. The Sultans of
Delhi did not possess a powerful army. During the period of Delhi Sultanate the
rulers seldom maintained a permanent army. Alauddin Khalji was the first ruler
who organized a permanent army but his successors failed to maintain this
practice and they again depended on the help of the provincial armies. Thus the
powerful soldiers became the makers of Sultans and the post of commander became
a stepping stone for capturing the throne and weak rulers became puppets n the
hands of powerful provincial Governors. Thus various provincial Governors
occupied the throne of Delhi.
5. The Hindu feudal
were anxious to cast away the yoke of Muslim slavery. Contemporary Persian
chroniclers write that the rulers of Ajmer, Sambhar and Gujarat tried again and
again to gain their independence against Qutubuddin Aibak. Powerful revolts of
Hindus broke out during the reign of Iltutmish and continued for years
together. Balban had to move heaven and earth in order to save the infant
Sultanate from the invasions of Hindu nobles and the people. Alauddin Khalji
tried to suppress the Hindus but as soon as the breathed his last the Hindus
again started revolting against the Sultanate. Thus only those powerful persons
were enthroned, who could face the resurgence of the Hindus.
6. The incessant
invasions of the Mongols also contributed to the rapid dynastic changes during
Delhi Sultanate. The Mongols first of all appeared on the north-west frontier
of India during the time of Iltutmish. With the passage of time, the frequency
of their invasions increased and they penetrated the interior of Multan and
Punjab. After the death of Balban they invaded the central part of Hindustan
and besieged even Delhi during the reign of Alauddin Khalji. Therefore, the
Sultans of Delhi had to pay attention to the safety of north-west frontier and
they built some forts there. The Sultans of Delhi could not spare enough time
to attend to the internal problems due to incessant invasions of Mongols.
Besides, the
invasions of Mongols encouraged the dissatisfied elements. Whenever the Mongols
invaded, the rebellious Hindu nobles and Amirs also raised the standard of
revolt. Only a powerful Sultan could face these invasions. But a new problem
emerged when in the 14th century the Mongol invasions ceased. It
affected the morale of the army adversely. Now there was no need to keep the
army fighting fit for facing any invasion. After Muhammad Tughluq none of the
Muslim rulers was a commander of high military capability. Hence the revolts of
the officials continued and helped the process of dynastic changes.
7. The Governor of
sultans was based on power and not on the will of the subjects. It had only two
motives. First, to establish law and order and second, to realize the revenue.
None of the Sultans had morality orientation and the people often revolted
against their autocratic rule. The resistance of the Hindus weakened the
Sultanate, making way for dynastic changes.
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.