Bahlol Lodi
Bahlol Lodi
|
Sultan of Delhi in Lodi
Dynasty
Founder of Lodi Dynasty
Reign – A.D. 1451 to
1489
Father – Malik
Kala
The founder of
the Lodi Dynasty was Bahlol Lodi. He was born in Afghanistan in the Sahu Khel
section of the Lodi clan. His grandfather, Malik Bahram came to India and
settled in the reign of Firoz Tughluq and joined the service of Malik Mardan,
the Governor of Multan. He had five sons, out of whom only Malik Sultan Shah
and Malik Kala earned some fame. Bahlol Lodi was the son of Malik Kala who
established his independent state after defeating the Khokhars. The uncle of
Bahlol, Malik Sultan Shah was the Governor of Sirhind.
After the death
of Malik Sultan Shah, Bahlol became the Governor of Sirhind. He was very
ambitious and was dissatisfied with his position. Realizing the weakness of the
Sultan of Delhi and mismanagement of the Sultanate, he declared his
independence. The Sultan of Delhi could not tolerate Bahlol’s behaviour and sent
an army against him which failed to defeat him. Once he had helped Muhammad
Shah, the ruler of Delhi, against Mahmood Khalji of Malwa for which he was
given the little of Khan-i-Jahan. It also added to the power and prestige of
Bahlol. He tried to establish his control over Delhi during the reign of Sayyid
Sultan Mahammad Shah but he could not succeed in doing so. Again during the
reign of Alauddin Alam Shah he was persuaded to invade Delhi by Hamid Khan, the
Wazir of the contemporary Sultan. He sent an invitation to Bahlol for making an
invasion of Alauddin Alam shah who was living in Badaun during this period.
Hence Bahlol captured Delhi without much difficulty.
After his
accession to the throne Bahlol found himself confronted with various problems.
The Sultanate of Delhi had weakened and the prestige and glory of kingship were
gone. Disorder and chaos were prevailing in the north-west frontier and Punjab
region. The Hindu chiefs of Doab were ready to resort to rebellion and the Sharqi rulers of Jaunpur had extended their influence. They were dreaming of
establishing their control over Delhi.
Bahlol Lodi was a
worthy and clever ruler. He understood it well that the Afghan nobles were the
backbone of his empire, so first of all he tried to please them. He bestowed
equal status on them. He never sat on the throne before them; rather he
preferred to sit with them on a carpet and discussed the problems of the
kingdom with them. It satisfied and pleased the Afghan rulers. In order to
strengthen his position he distributed posts, title and rewards with open hands
to the nobles and invitees from Afghanistan. He also endeavored to satisfy his
soldiers.
After having
consolidated his internal position, Bahlol Lodi directed his attention to his
foreign policy so that confusion and anarchy could be removed.
Bahlol Lodi was not only the founder
of the Lodi Dynasty but was also a brave and fearless warrior and a successful
commander. He enhanced the glory and strength of the sultanate by his incessant
efforts. Dr. A.L. Srivastavaa has written about him, “Bahlol was a brave and
intrepid soldier and successful general.”
In his personal life Bahlol Lodi was
kind and generous. He used to give alms to the poor and never let them go
disappointed from his door. He respected women. He behaved very gently with the
queen of Sultan Hsain Shah and sent her to her Husband. He was a religious-minded
sultan and followed his religion firmly. Although he was not much educated, yet
he provided shelter to the scholars.
As he remained busy in constant wars,
he could not pay attention to reforms in administration. However, he loved his
subjects. He paid due respect to the Afghan nobles. Once he said to them, “If
you think me unworthy of the status, occupy it, choose someone else, and bestow
on me some other office.” He was a great lover of justice and had no pride of
his position. Dr. Ishwari Prasad remarks, “As the founder of the new dynasty
and the restorer of the waning prestige of the Delhi monarchy, Bahlol deserves
a high place in history.”
Bahlol Lodi believed in equality and
did not sit on the throne in social gatherings. The author of Tarikh-i-Daudi
remarks, “in social meetings he never sat on the throne, and would not allow
his nobles to stand and even during the public audiences he did not occupy the
throne, but seated himself upon a carpet…. He maintained a brotherly intercourse
with all his chiefs and soldiers.”
Dr. R.P. Tripathi pointing out to his
shortcomings has remarked, “He lowered the dignity of the crown and reduced
kingship to a sort of exalted peerage. Instead of the role of one autocrat, he
permitted numerous autocrats.”
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.