Nana
Phadnavis (1742-1800)
Nana
Phadnavis was born in 1742 and he died at the age of 58. He was thin in body
and half fair in complexion. He was always serious and was hardly seen
laughing. He was very studious and regular in his habits. He worked very hard
at his desk. He attended to all the details of the administration. He did not
like the open methods of Mahadji and always worked in secret. He was usually
reasonable and fair in his dealings. He was afraid to commit treachery of
wrong.he was strict in punctually carrying on the work. However, he did not possess
self-sufficiency of Mahadji. He took counsel with all separately, but acted
according to his own considered judgment. He was not at all loved as he was a
stern task master. He was often in danger of assassination. On about 20
occasions, he had a miraculous escape from attempts on his life.
Nana
lacked military leadership and that was a great disadvantage in the rough times
in which he lived.
Nana did
not possess a conciliatory spirit. He gradually removed all the members, one by
one, of the Bara-Bhai Council and concentrated all power in his own hands. If
instead of that, Nana had shared powers with others, there would have been
better prospects for the future of the Marathas. It has been suggested that if
Nana Phadnavis had taken into confidence all the Maratha chiefs and pooled
together all the resources of the Marathas, the Marathas would not have fallen
as they did under Bajirao II.
Nana had
too much love for power. It is suggested that if he had retired from politics
in 1795, he would have rendered a great service to the Maratha cause.
Another
criticism of Nana Phadnavis is that he loved money too much. It is estimated
that his private property amounted to several lakhs. It was with a view to
safeguarding his own money that he opposed to the nomination of Bajirao Peshwa
at the beginning.
According
to Sardesai, Nana would have acquired a much higher place in history if he had
subordinated his love of power and monetary interest to the service of the
nation.
Reference
may be made to some of the tributes paid to Nana after his death, according to
Captain Browning, “Nana is gone and with him the Brahman Raj. Poona has
fallen.”
According
to Palmer, “With Nana has departed all the wisdom and moderation of the Maratha
Government.”
According
to Sir Richard Temple, “Maratha administration lost all vestige of honey and
efficiency by the death of its great Minister.”
According
to Grant Duff, “Nana Phadnavis was certainly a great statesman. His principal
defects originated in the want of personal courage and in an ambition not
always restaied by principles. His life was entirely public. In private he was
a man of strict veracity, humane, frugal and charitable. His whole time was
regulated with the strictest order and the business personally transacted by
him almost exceeds credibility. Nana doubtless shines out as the last genius produced by the Maratha nation.”
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.