Lord
Wellesley (1798-1805)
Lord
Wellesley, “the great Pro-Consul”, was appointed the Governor-General of Bengal
at the age of 37. He was one of the greatest of the British rulers of India.
The only persons who can stand comparison with him are Lord Clive, Warren Hastings and Lord Dalhousie. In the matte of actual achievements, he beat all
of them.
Condition
of India in 1798 : When Lord Wellesley come to India as Governor-General, the
condition of India was very critical. The Nizam was angry because the English
company had not helped him when he was attacked by the Marathas in the time of
Sir John Shore. He was organizing a body of regular troops under a French
officer named Raymond. The Marathas were also feeling a sense of importance on
account of their victory over the Nizam. They had huge resources and were
controlling practically the whole of Central India. Scindia had a powerful army
which was trained and commanded by a Frenchman called Perron. Undoubtedly, the
key position occupied by the French officers in the India States were a source
of real danger to the English Company. Sultan Tipu had not forgotten the
humiliation to which he was subjected by Lord Cornwallis when he was forced to
give up half of his territory, pay a huge war indemnity and also surrender his
two sons as hostages. He was the deadly enemy of the English Company and openly
so. He was carrying on negotiations with the French Governor of Mauritius and
Reunion. He had employed French officers to drill his soldiers and train them.
There was the danger of the invasion of Napoleon. He was already on his way to
the East.
Thus, the
political situation in the country was not an easy one. The English Company had
not much of resources and it was left to the intelligence, bravery and resourcefulness
of Lord Wellesley to tackle the situation in a masterly manner. Within the next
7 years, Lord Wellesley was able to defeat and humble the enemies of the
English Company. Many of them submitted without striking a blow. However,
before he could finish his work, he was forced to resign in 1805.
The one
thing to be noted with regard to Lord Wellesley is that when he came to India,
he felt that the policy of non-intervention was not at all practicable. That
was due to the political condition in the country. On account of the absence of
a paramount power each state could do whatever it pleased. There was no
guarantee of peace. There was no supreme power to which an aggrieved State
could appeal for help. Under the circumstances, Lord Wellesley came to the
conclusion that either the English Company must become the Supreme power in the
country or quit the country. There was absolutely no half-way. It was with this
conviction in mind that Lord Wellesley started his work.
Subsidiary
system : One of the great master strokes of Lord Wellesley was the application
of the system of subsidiary alliances to a large number of Indian states. It
was in this way that he was able to add to the resources of the English
Company, oust the foreigners from the Indian States and make the English
Company the arbiter in the affairs of the Indian states. However, it is wrong
to say that Lord Wellesley was the author of the system of subsidiary
alliances.
According
to Sir Alfred Lyall, there were four stages in the evolution of the subsidiary
system. To begin with, the English Company contented itself with lending a
military contingent to help some Indian princes. This was done by Warren
Hastings when he lent British troops to the Nawab of Oudh to fight against the
Rohillas. The second stage came when the English Company took the field on its
own account. It was usually assisted by the army of some Indian prince who was
not strong enough to do the job single-handed. In the third stage, the English
Company asked the ruler of the State to give money so that troops might be
maintained for the defense of the state. Such a treaty was made by Sir John
Shore with the Nawab of Oudh in 1797. The Nawab promised to pay a sum of Rs. 76
lakhs a year. A similar treaty was made with the Nizam by Lord Wellessley.
The
English Company was not satisfied with the subsidies paid by the Indian rulers.
In many cases, they were too irregular to be depended upon. The result was that
the English Company thought of another form of subsidiary system under which an
Indian State was made to give up a part of its territory so that out of its
revenues the troops could be maintained.
It is
rightly pointed out that the English were not the originators of the system of
subsidiary alliances. According to Ranade, “the idea (of subsidiary system) was
in fact a mere reproduction on a more organized scale of the plan followed by
the Maratha leaders a hundred years in advance when they secured the grant of
Chauth and Sardeshmukhi from the imperial authority at Delhi.” Some writers
give credit to the French. It is pointed out that it is men like Dupleix who
started the system of giving help to Indian rulers for money or other reward.
However, it cannot be denied that it was Lord Wellesley who perfected the
system of subsidiary alliances.
Under the
subsidiary system, the ruler who entered into a subsidiary alliance was to give
money or some territory to the English company for the maintenance of a
contingent force. He was also to agree to deal with foreign states only through
the English company. He was to have no direct correspondence or relations with
them. If the ruler had any dispute with any other state, he was to make the
English Company his arbitrator. He was to turn out from his State all
non-English Europeans whether they were employed in the army or civil
administration. The English Company was to undertake to defend that State from
external attack or internal trouble. It is clear that the subsidiary State
surrendered its political independence in return for British protection.
0 टिप्पणियाँ:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें
THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS
टिप्पणी: केवल इस ब्लॉग का सदस्य टिप्पणी भेज सकता है.